This fund operates on trust, speed, and minimal interference because the overwhelming majority of producers we work with deserve exactly that. The protections below exist for the rare exception, not the rule — and they're stated plainly so everyone knows where the line actually is.
Proper use of funds allows us to open financial doors to you that otherwise are inaccessible to the general public of the funding scene.
Misuse of funds reflects badly upon your reputation and reflects badly upon us — and we have zero tolerance for this.
IF YOU HAVE BEEN INVITED TO THIS FUND, IT MEANS WE TRUST YOU AND WISH TO PROCEED.
All projects are hand-curated and vetted by our team before ever receiving an offer.
Our speed is due to our ability to read people and projects and budgets with depth and empathy that is rare. We can assess you in a single phone call. We do not need endless meetings. This is due to elite training and experience.
We want to support you.
Along those lines, Do not confuse that speed or openness to funding for weakness. Any misuse of funds is taken very seriously and will be acted upon as we deem fit within the bounds of the law.
Funding under this agreement may be revoked, and the Fund may pursue repayment and legal remedy, only if:
This does not apply to a film that simply underperforms, runs over schedule for ordinary production reasons, or evolves creatively from its original pitch. That's the nature of making something good — it's expected, and it's protected. These terms exist for bad faith, not for the normal risk of real production.
Funding is issued to a project, not a person, and on the basis of what was represented to secure it. The following protections apply to every deal, regardless of medium or budget size:
Money is wired to the production's own business entity, not a personal account. This isn't bureaucracy — it's the single clearest line between "funding a project" and "handing someone cash," and it's standard for any production financing anywhere.
What you represent — scope, team, chain of title, use of the money — is what the funding is issued against. Reasonable creative and operational reallocation within the project is expected. Funding a different project entirely, or no project at all, is not.
If the budget, scope, chain of title, rights, or team composition submitted to secure funding was knowingly false, this agreement is void and funds are subject to recovery.
If a substantial portion of funding is knowingly used for something other than the named production — with no genuine intent to produce it — the Fund can demand repayment, pursue damages, and refer the matter to counsel or law enforcement where warranted.
This is enforcement against bad faith, not creative risk. A project that runs over schedule, evolves from its original pitch, or simply doesn't perform commercially is not a violation of anything. These protections exist for one purpose: stopping someone from taking funding with no intention of making what they said they'd make.
Disputes are resolved through binding arbitration, not public litigation — faster and more private for everyone, and available equally to either party if a dispute ever arises.
One licensed broker carries sole financial responsibility on every transaction, and every term here is documented in the signed funding agreement before a wire is sent — nothing here exists only as a verbal understanding.
Funding is issued to a project, not a person, on the basis of what was represented to secure it, and after the Fund's own review of the team, budget, and project. The protections below cover the realistic ways that trust could be broken — stated plainly because clarity protects everyone, not just the Fund.
Funds are released only to a verified, real business entity matching the team and project that were reviewed and approved. Funds redirected to a different entity, a personal account, or a party not disclosed during review void this agreement.
The submitted budget — scope, line items, team, timeline — is the basis of the deal. Knowingly inflating costs, listing fictitious vendors or contractors, or submitting a budget never intended to be followed is a material misrepresentation, regardless of whether funds are technically "spent" against it.
Funding requires genuine, ongoing intent to produce the named project. Taking funding while having no real plan, team, or capacity to produce the work — even if some activity occurs to create the appearance of progress — is treated as bad faith, not as slow execution.
Funds knowingly used for a substantially different project, for personal expenses unrelated to the production, or transferred to a third party outside the scope of ordinary production vendor payments, are recoverable in full.
Misrepresenting ownership, chain of title, underlying rights, team composition, or guild/union status necessary to lawfully produce or release the project voids this agreement, independent of how the funds themselves were spent.
Knowingly withholding a material fact during review that would have changed the Fund's decision to fund — an existing legal dispute over the IP, an undisclosed prior funding source for the same budget, a team member who isn't who they were represented to be — is treated the same as a direct misrepresentation.
Conduct occurring after funding that would have constituted a misrepresentation if disclosed at the time of review — for example, the project's rights being sold or encumbered elsewhere without disclosure — is treated the same as if it had been false from the start.
Ordinary creative evolution, schedule delays from real production circumstances, honest budget reallocation, or a finished, genuinely attempted project that simply does not sell or perform. None of that is a violation. The line is intent — did this person genuinely try to make what they said they'd make, with the money they said they'd use.
Remedies: repayment demand, recovery of misapplied funds, damages, and referral to counsel or law enforcement where warranted. Disputes resolved through binding, mutual arbitration.
Our terms may evolve as needed. All recipients of funds are bound to our basic, fair, honest, and generous, and enforced, terms at contract signing and for the life of the project agreed upon.
Any questions or concerns or remedies, do not hesitate to contact us.
Be financially honest. Don't bait & switch. Do what you say you will do. Use funds as agreed upon and obey the law.
Submit your project and we'll be in touch within days.
Submit your project →Every Quantum Entertainment Fund deal is bound by a single standard: what you read is what you sign, and what you sign is what gets wired. No upfront fees, no hidden clauses, no side letters, no creative interference. One licensed broker carries sole financial responsibility on every transaction.
Profit-share and/or small % budget-share economics. No collateral demands, no liens against your IP, no debt service eating into production. We do not gouge percentages. Our compensation is proportionate to the project as per terms of agreement. Our incentive is to fund more deals, not gouge a single project.
That is our only compensation per deal at present time. Any additional compensation per project is optional, and offered by you.
Once you are funded, you are funded — and you are in full control. No greenlight committee can pull the plug. No regime change upstairs can shut you down mid-build. The wire lands whole, and the work belongs to you.
We never own the creator's IP at any point in this process. Characters, world, code, masters, and underlying rights remain entirely with you, from the first wire to the final release and beyond.
The creative advisor is the business partner of this fund — shaping the editorial standard and reading projects on the creative merit. The creative advisor does not handle funds, term sheets, or any regulated financial activity. The licensed broker is solely responsible for all financial operations — licensing, term sheets, signatures, wires, and every regulated function.